Archive | EGU GA 2012 RSS feed for this section

EGU 2012 General Assembly: the highlights

19 Jun

The most recent video uploaded to EGU’s YouTube page, the EGU 2012 General Assembly highlights video, brings back good memories. It’s a compilation of some of the best moments at the conference and was produced by Sue Voice, who worked at the press office in Vienna.

Sue says, “Part of my role in the media team at EGU2012 involved producing short movie clips and photos for EGU’s social media platforms. This movie clip was not quite conventional; it was mostly captured with an iPad2, edited in iMovie and the final product compiled in Motion4. With over 11,000 people attending the EGU 2012 General Assembly, it was a wonderful challenge to try and capture the essence of the event. I had a fantastic time and learnt a lot during my week in Vienna and made many new friends. Thank you to all the people who appear in the movie, you are all stars of EGU2012. Also, a big thank you to Bárbara T. Ferreira and Edvard Glücksman for allowing me the opportunity to explore and create.”

Sue’s video equipment with the ACV in the background.

Thank YOU Sue!

Can you spot yourself, or one of your geoscience colleagues, in the video?

Imaggeo on Mondays: Melt Stream

28 May

Melt Stream, Greenland by Ian Joughin, distributed by the EGU under a Creative Commons license.

Supraglacial lakes are created when water forms in depressions on top of a glacier, remaining there until it dissipates by seeping through crevasses, or cracks in the ice sheet. Despite their sometimes impressive size, supraglacial lakes may drain in a matter of hours under the right conditions, when the pressure they exert on the ice causes it to crack creating a sometimes spectacular lake draining event.

Draining of supraglacial lakes may have important environmental consequences and may even, as warming temperatures further increase meltwater volumes, affect rates of sea-level rise by accelerating the rate by which ice sheets slide into the ocean.

Dr Ian Joughin, from the University of Washington Polar Science Center, took this breathtaking photo under freezing conditions, earning him the 1st Prize at the 2012 General Assembly photo competition. He explains, “This image was taken as part of a project investigating the rapid drainage of supraglacial lakes in Greenland. Each year, these lakes, which often are a few kilometers across and 10 or meters deep, fill with melt water. If the water can find an open crack, it fills the crack and the greater density of water relative to ice allows it to hydro-fracture through the full thickness (~1 km) of the ice sheet, causing the entire lake to drain rapidly (< 2hours). This picture shows a large melt stream that we encountered as we were out exploring the lake basin, and it is only one of many streams feeding the lake.”

Additional images from this trip can be viewed here.

Imaggeo is the online open access geosciences image repository of the European Geosciences Union. Every geoscientist who is an amateur photographer (but also other people) can submit their images to this repository. Being open access, it can be used by scientists for their presentations or publications as well as by the press. If you submit your images to imaggeo, you retain full rights of use, since they are licenced and distributed by EGU under a Creative Commons licence.

What did you like about the EGU 2012 General Assembly?

22 May

In the most recent video uploaded to EGU’s YouTube page, Sue Voice, who worked at the press office in Vienna, asks General Assembly participants what they like the most about the conference. Check out their answers in the clip below!

And you, what did you like about EGU 2012?

Imaggeo on Mondays: Icy Landscape

21 May

Icy Landscape by Lucien von Gunten, distributed by the EGU under a Creative Commons license.

Ice is a hazardous beauty, ephemeral in nature and, under the right conditions, capable of dominating landscapes. Earlier this year, while North America enjoyed an unusually mild winter, central and eastern Europe experienced brutal cold spells. The continent witnessed widespread freezing as cold air swept south from Siberia, claiming hundreds of lives, knocking out power supplies, and disrupting transport services. In Poland and the Ukraine, temperatures dropped as low as -33C and in Italy over 80,000 citizens were left without electricity after power lines were felled by trees.

This year’s icy spell brought Switzerland its coldest weather since 1987, the year it experienced its lowest ever recorded temperature. Lucien von Gunten, Science Officer at PAGES (Past Global Changes), explains the exceptional circumstances behind this captivating shot, taken earlier this year. “In Versoix, near the Lake of Geneva, the combination of low temperatures and strong easterly winds led to an unusual natural spectacle as the lake shores were partly covered with ice. Images of cars and boats under a thick ice shell were shown in the international press. Next to these popular eye-catchers one could also admire smaller scale ice structure, such as those depicted on this photograph, which covers an area of 30×30 cm.” This photo won 3rd Prize at the 2012 General Assembly photo competition.

Exceptional weather events, such as extreme temperatures, drought, or tropical storms and hurricanes, have increased in frequency over the past 50 years, partly as a result of human-induced climate change.

More pictures of Switzerland during this year’s freeze can be seen here.

Imaggeo is the online open access geosciences image repository of the European Geosciences Union. Every geoscientist who is an amateur photographer (but also other people) can submit their images to this repository. Being open access, it can be used by scientists for their presentations or publications as well as by the press. If you submit your images to imaggeo, you retain full rights of use, since they are licenced and distributed by EGU under a Creative Commons licence.

Drill cores and climate: An EGU 2012 poster presentation

15 May

In the past few weeks, we have been publishing various reports from the 2012 General Assembly, courtesy of our guest bloggers. Today, we bring you yet another report, in video format this time, produced by the lovely Sue Voice who worked at the press office in Vienna. The video features Otago University’s Christian Ohneiser talking about his PhD project. Christian tells Sue how drill cores, retrieved from remote dry valleys of Antarctica, can help us understand the past climate of the Southern Ocean.

Imaggeo on Mondays: Burst

14 May

Burst by Melissa S. Bukovsky, distributed by EGU under a Creative Commons license.

This photo won 2nd Prize at the 2012 General Assembly photo competition and, according to the photographer, Melissa S. Bukovsky, epitomises the idea that an expensive camera is not a necessity for taking great photos. “You just need to know how to use what you have. I travel with a point and shoot that fits in my back pocket,” she explains.

Currently a Project Scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Bukovsky snapped this shot on one of her many work related trips. “This picture of a bursting mud bubble in a boiling pool of mud was taken just outside of the Wai-O-Tapu geothermal area near Rotorua, New Zealand.  The area is part of New Zealand’s Taupo volcanic zone. I stayed in this area for a few days of holiday before traveling back to the US after working in Melbourne for the summer.  Aside from all of the fantastic geothermal phenomena to see in that area, there are numerous hot springs that are great for relaxing in.”

Mud pools, hot springs of bubbling mud, form in high-temperature geothermal areas where water is in short supply. The little water that is available rises to the surface at a spot where the soil is rich in volcanic ash, clay, and other fine particulates. The viscosity of the mud varies, from fluid during the rainy season to viscous in drier months.

The Wai-O-Tapu geothermal complex has been protected as a scenic reserve since 1931 and it remains a major tourist attraction.

Imaggeo is the online open access geosciences image repository of the European Geosciences Union. Every geoscientist who is an amateur photographer (but also other people) can submit their images to this repository. Being open access, it can be used by scientists for their presentations or publications as well as by the press. If you submit your images to imaggeo, you retain full rights of use, since they are licenced and distributed by EGU under a Creative Commons licence.

Cold-Labs to computer modelling: An interview with Dr Gaël Durand

9 May

Dr Adam Booth, now becoming a regular contributor to GeoLog, is about to begin a post-doctoral position at Imperial College, London. This is his final report from the 2012 General Assembly, following articles on subglacial lakes and mountain glacier research more generally.

Another year, another conference!  This is my final post from the EGU’s General Assembly and, again, I’ve found it a really useful meeting – both in terms of the presentations I’ve seen and the people I’ve spoken to.  I’m wrapping up my blogs with a conversation with Dr Gaël Durand, of the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Enivronment (LGGE) at the Université de Grenoble, France.  Gaël is this year’s recipient of the ‘Outstanding Young Scientist Award’ for EGU’s Crysophere Division, so I collared him during Thursday night’s poster presentations for the lowdown on his research – and what it is that makes it so medal-worthy!  “It’s not me you should ask!” he laughs, but it soon becomes clear why Gaël’s experiences make him an ideal candidate for recognition.

Dr Gaël Durand, during Thursday evening’s “Modelling ice sheets and glaciers” poster session.

If you attend a series of glaciological presentations, you’ll find scientists who are interested in all size scales of the cryosphere: from the micro-structure of snow and ice crystals to the growth and decline of continental-sized ice masses – it really isn’t size that counts.  Gaël’s current research is of the ‘large-scale’ variety.  Using powerful computer algorithms, Gaël and his colleagues are able to model and predict the flow dynamics of ice-sheets (such as those that cover Greenland and Antarctica).  In my limited experience of computer modelling, I’ve always understood that flow models do a good job of characterising bulk ice properties – but their quality becomes poor when you ‘zoom in’ to individual glaciers, since their small-scale dynamics are just too complex.  However, in talking to Gaël, I discover that this opinion is becoming a thing of the past, and that the rate of advance in ice-sheet modelling is anything but glacial.  “Our models are now much more complex than before,” he says, “and we can deal with each glacier individually.”  The figure below shows an example of this complexity in a model of Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica.  The fine-detail of glacier dynamics is represented using an adaptive mesh (the network of triangles in the image), which offers model resolution as small as 500 m; only a few years ago, the best resolution that could be used was no smaller than a few tens of kilometres.

A cutting-edge model of glacier flow velocity for Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica (red and blue colours show faster and slower velocities, respectively). The model complexity allows grid resolution to shrink as low as 500 m. Note how the mesh is much finer across velocity transitions.

Perhaps Gaël’s desire to improve model complexity stems from his early experiences in glaciology?  As a PhD student at the Université de Grenoble he worked on a finer-scale altogether.  Using an ice core from the EPICA Dome C project, Gaël spent hours in a cold lab, slicing the core into thin-sections for microscopic analysis.  He tells me that “the 3 kilometre ice core was sliced every 10 m,” resulting in hundreds of thin-sections – and hundreds of days spent in a freezing cold room!  But the hard (and cold!) work paid off, as the microscopic structure of the ice crystals (measured with an ‘Automatic Ice Texture Analyser’ at the University of Copenhagen) revealed detailed information about the deformation history of individual ice layers.  Gaël then collaborated with ice-flow modelers to explain the observed deformation fabrics, and thereby established his own niche: a computer modeler with direct experience of the importance of the smallest-scale ice properties.

Eager to discover what else I didn’t know about ice-sheet modelling, I asked Gaël where the most significant developments were happening right now.  His immediate answer is “ice-sheet grounding lines.”  Although an ice-sheet is predominantly land-based, Antarctica in particular is fringed by floating ice, where the ice sheet overrides the open ocean.  The grounding line is therefore the position where the ice-sheet starts to float.

Sketch of an ice-sheet’s grounding line. The grounding line represents the transition from ice resting on land to ice floating on the ocean.

“The problem is that basal conditions are drastically changing,” Gaël says.  “The ice-sheet quickly goes from resting on a hard bed to floating on the ocean.  We had big problem defining where the ice is floating, and where it is not.”  In the last year, however, ‘Full Stokes’ modelling methods have revolutionised the representation of grounding line processes; furthermore, as shown earlier, typical model resolution has been sharpened ten-fold.  Such advances have benefited from developments in supercomputer technology, although the vital statistics of their performance are still eye-watering: with 100 computer processors at his disposal, Gaël’s simulations of a century’s worth of ice-flow still take around a week to output results!

I dared to ask when we’d be able to model the whole of the Antarctic ice-sheet, including the unique properties of all its individual glaciers.  Genuinely expecting to be told to forget about it, I was amazed when Gaël answered “It will come soon.”  In the next ten years?  Within the next one year!  Gaël is confident that some sophisticated models on the cusp of development will have the required complexity to do the job.

A conversation with Gaël really encapsulates much of what we’re trying to do as glaciologists.  Our end goal is to predict what will happen to the cryosphere under future climate scenarios – but, for this to happen, we require reliable and comprehensive observations of glacier systems such that they can be incorporated in a model (which strikes a strong chord with me as a field geophysicist).  What made Gaël’s research medal-worthy?  For me, his outlook really brings together all aspects of crysopheric science, and applies it at the cutting edge… but I might hold him to his one-year prediction at the next EGU!

By Adam Booth, post-doc at Imperial College, London

Are we giants or ants? The future of hydrology discussed at the 2012 General Assembly

8 May

Today’s guest post, written during the 2012 General Assembly, comes from Eline Vanuytrecht from the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at KU Leuven, Belgium. This is her second post for GeoLog after her insightful piece on climate change and Portuguese wines. 

Keynote speakers, ‘giants’ in the field of hydrology, were invited to give their opinion on the path that hydrologists should follow in the coming decade to tackle future challenges.

Professor Keith Beven (University of Lancaster) opened the debate by criticizing the occasional abuse of hydrological models for prediction purposes.  Although the present demand from policy makers for accurate predictions and quick answers is oppressing, Beven requests his fellow hydrologists to be courageous in the coming decade and to dare to reject models. “Adopt the alternative view that models  are wrong until they are proven to be right. The process of rejection and the reflection on the question why a model should be rejected, brings us to a better understanding of the whole system that is modeled.” At the same time, Beven warns that the rejectionist framework he proposes entails the risk to abandon reliable models falsely. Next to this rejectionist framework, Beven emphasizes the need for improvement of observational techniques. “Observations are the ground on which widely used models are based. Disinformation, invoked by observations of inferior quality, should be avoided.”

Water featured prominently at the 2012 General Assembly (source: Wikimedia)

Professor Gordon Young (President International Association of Hydrological Sciences) started with a remarkable request. “In the coming decades, hydrologists should drop their unique subject of hydrology. Emphasis should also lie on water resources.” Young’s perspective is one of human needs and the permanent issue of water security. Water is essential for diverse human services, including food production, health care, energy production to sustain economies, preservation of ecosystems and a whole web of social interactions. At the same time, water resources can be threats for humankind in the form of floods, droughts, and pollution. It should be, according to Young, the mission of hydrologists to focus on these topics in the coming decades. Hydrological research should be embedded in a social, economical and political context.

Professor Thorsten Wagener (University of Bristol) increasingly descries water-related problems as a result of changes in climate, land use, and population dynamics. He assigns an important role to the hydrology community to solve these problems if they can acquire reliable predictive power in a changing world. According to Wagener, this is only possible if there is a continuous knowledge accumulation in the science of hydrology. “There are three complementary pathways to achieve this continuous scientific progress: good data accessibility, a focus on comparative or synthetic science, and an initiative structure of hydrological sciences.” According to Wagener, it is essential that data is reported uniformly and that it is accessible. Comparative scientific attitudes help to identify cases with a similar behavior in time and or space, crucial for knowledge transfer. Protocols should be designed to ensure uniformity and an easy knowledge transfer. The initiative structure refers to the attractiveness of hydrology. “It should be both inspirational and relevant.”

Professor Hubert Savenije (TU Delft) started his talk with focusing on the behavior of hydrologists. “Are we ants or are we giants?” The ants are without a doubt hardworking creatures, digging holes in the ground and coming up with surprising conclusions. But they see only a small part of the whole system. Instead, the overlooking perspective of giants is needed in the field of hydrology in the coming decades, according to Savenije. Landscapes and their hydrological processes should be mapped to the model space. “But it is often forgotten that the landscape is extensively determined by its medium. And this medium is an evolutionary product of a combination of morphological, ecological, hydrological and anthropological processes.” Hydrology should be approached from a Darwinian point of view in the coming decade. Hydrological processes should be understood in a co-evolutionary perspective, and once understood in this framework, equations can derived to describe important processes.

Concluding words came from Professor Xavier Sanchez-Vila (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya). He dug deeper than his colleagues, literally, and focused his talk on hydrogeology, the science of deep groundwater. His concern is multi- and interdisciplinary work, which should not be disconnected from society needs. Sanchez-Vila argues that communication problems are at the basis of misunderstanding between disciplines, but also among hydrologists. “Four topics that deserve attention in the coming decade are ecohydraulics, water quality, uncertainty issues related to climate change and extreme events, and risk management. The solutions are often simple, but the problems are not.”

With these visionary talks, the keynote speakers may not only have touched important issues for the coming Hydrological Decade. A critical reflection may prove useful for the whole science community. Change is challenging.

By Eline Vanuytrecht, KU Leuven

Uploading 2012 General Assembly presentations

7 May

This year it is once again possible to upload your General Assembly oral presentations and posters for online publication alongside your abstract, giving all participants a chance to revisit your contribution. Files can be in either PowerPoint or PDF format. Note that presentations will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Licence. The upload of your presentation is free of charge and is not followed by a review process. All legal and technical information as well as the upload form are available here. You will need to log in using your Copernicus Office User ID [using the ID of the Corresponding Author].

Share your presentation with the world by uploading it to the 2012 General Assembly website.

Review: 2012 General Assembly Great Debate on open science and the future of publishing

4 May

Today’s guest post comes from freelance writer Celso Gomes, who also worked at the 2012 General Assembly Press Centre.

Upon admitting that he refused to knowingly associate with Elsevier for years, Cambridge’s award-winning mathematician Tim Gowers stirred a discussion of unprecedented magnitude surrounding Open Access publishing. Such public outcry has so far culminated with over 10.000 other researchers following in his footsteps and vowing to boycott Elsevier journals, and the movement is still gaining momentum. Has the time come for a new publishing paradigm?

The first of this year’s Great Debates explored just that question, starring some of the heavyweights from both sides of the barricade. From the traditional publishing industry, delegates from Elsevier, Springer, and Oxford University Press (OUP) were present; and the Open Access movement was represented by PloS, Copernicus.org and the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.

Great Debate on Open Access publishing, including the panelists and chair, Edvard Glücksman of the EGU (far right). Photo: Suzanne Voice

After a quick introduction of the panelists, the debate kicked off by giving voice to a thought that has been on the mind of many researchers: why have the traditional publishers been so resistant to move towards open access? –  provocatively suggesting it might all boil down to profit margins. Opinions were as polarised as could be expected but it quickly became clear that profit is just one dimension of a very complex question.

In fact, the case was put forward that there are already several business models in the academic publishing field and not all can successfully accommodate a shift towards open access, with journals in the social sciences and also learned societies-backed journals as two examples. Fields with little to no centralised funding sources would arguably find it financially unsustainable to make the shift from subscription-based to the author pays model, as a significant portion of the individual or group-level research budget would need to be allocated to cover publication costs. On the other hand, the many societies which rely on the steady revenue stream from their publications are (claimed to be) weary of making the shift due to concerns that income from their journals might be significantly reduced or disappear altogether. However, such financial hurdles might be just temporary, as new financial models to back academic publishing are being developed by funders and research institutions themselves.

The discussion moved on to explore what might happen to research communication in the future, driven by the rise to dominance of a much more versatile digital media which has technological tools that challenge the conceptual notion of the research article. Geosciences are a particularly interesting case in this respect, given that the knowledge that needs to be transferred goes far beyond the images and text of the contemporary journal articles – large data sets seem almost ubiquitous and some (incredibly complex) concepts are much better explained in video than in writing. Publishing houses recognise this trend and appear to be experimenting with new formats, but details are sparse at this stage and it is unclear to what extent traditional publishing houses will make content freely available and what will continue to be hidden behind a paywall.

Still, there is a clear sense amongst all the panel members that Open Access publishing (and open science) will eventually rise to prominence , but how fast the changes take place is largely dependent on the researcher’s ability to break free from the current publishing paradigm – will it be gradual or are we witnessing an ‘academic spring’? While there is no answer, there are solid arguments for both cases, which you can revisit in detail by watching the debate in its entirety on the General Assembly’s website.

By Celso Gomes, freelance writer